Your shady car salesman is your government’s fault

how-to-negotiate-on-a-used-car-salesman

It’s funny how many people point to shady car salesmen and auto dealerships as a sign of “market failure,” yet fail to mention, if they’re even aware, that state governments mandate that cars be sold that way due to the political influence dealership associations in legislatures.

If we had a truly free market in auto sales, manufacturers would be able to bypass the slicker-than-oil car salesmen all together, which would most likely reduce the starting price dramatically once you start eliminating auto dealer add ons like the patently absurd “dealer doc fees” and allow for easier liquidation of inventories and reducing burdens on the consumer feedback process to manufactures.

Even some at the US Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division have called for the legalization of such transactions.

Socialism has destroyed Venzuela

Socialism has not only never in history delivered on its grand promises, it has destroyed the lives, liberties, property, and the entire culture of every society that it has infected like the putrid virus that it is.

Market liberalism under a limited constitutional state that protects individual rights, on the other hand, has delivered radical prosperity, liberty, peace, and harmony wherever and whenever it’s been accepted.

Dept. of Homeland Security grants German homeschooling family asylum

In a victory for homeschooling and educational freedom, the Department of Homeland Security today, reacting from yesterday’s Supreme Court’s denial to hear their case, has granted asylum to the Romeike family, a German family that fled persecution from a Nazi-era compulsory school law that bans homeschooling.

This dramatic decision reverses the U.S. Supreme Court’s refusal to hear the family’s plea for asylum, granting the family “indefinite preferred status,” meaning that they can stay in the US permanently.

The decision comes at a time when the German school system’s rigid ban on homeschooling has been coming under fire in the international community.

In November of 2012, the first annual holding of the Global Home Education Conference to place in Berlin to affirm the natural human right for parents to educate their children independent of the state. Among the documents cited supporting this right was Article 26, Section 3 of the 1948 UN Declaration of Human Rights, which says that “parents have a prior right to choose the kind of education that shall be given to their children.”

Unfortunately, however, the same article also declares that education shall education, in at least the “elementary and fundamental states” (whatever that means), must be “free” and “compulsory.”

New map shows progress of gun rights over the last several decades

The Libertarian Republic has an interesting GIF up that displays the rapid political change on gun rights over the last 28 years in America, starting in 1986 when the vast majority of states were either “may issue” (where you have to prove to the government that you should have a gun permit) or “no issue” (where you can be denied your right to keep and bear arms entirely).

It is almost unimaginable how most of South were “no issue” states (even Texas!), and leftist Vermont was (and fortunately still is) an unrestricted state where you do not need any permits to conceal carry, also commonly referred to as “Constitutional carry” by gun rights activists.

And throughout this period, much to chagrin of anti-Second Amendment advocates, crime rates in all areas have been steadily going down in America as the number of concealed carry permit holders has skyrocketed and shows no signs of abetting.

Florida, for example, has issued 1.96 million permits since 1987, and Texas about half a million to its credit, while both started out as may issue and no-issue states, respectively, in the mid 1980’s.

By 2011, there were only two no issue states: Wisconsin and Illinois. That year, Republican Governor Scott Walker signed legislation mandating state officials switch to shall issue permits on application. In 2012, A federal court struck down Illinois’ overly rigid system, thereby officially ending the status of no issue permit issuing in America.

However, many Second Amendment proponents believe that gun rights will only truly be respected in America when the whole permitting system itself goes by the wayside, thus making every state an unrestricted “Constitutional carry” state. I wish them luck.

In the meantime, more states are also liberalizing restrictions on bringing personal weapons onto public property like universities, citing the problem of gun free zones as magnets for mass shootings who know they will not face armed opposition.

In my state of Idaho, such legislation just passed the state Senate, the relevant House committee in the state House of Representatives, and will be going up befor the entire lower chamber for a full vote in the coming weeks where it is expected to pass easily. Idaho Governor Butch Otter has indicated that he will sign the bill.

The pointless symbolism of “Add the Words”

11tKCX.AuSt.36

(Photo credit: Idaho Statesman)

It should be considered a mandatory lesson to learn that any political movement that thinks writing down words on parchment paper will end bad behavior, real or imagined, is one that is destined for failure and disappointment.

Enter the “Add The Words” movement in Idaho. This group of gay rights activists takes its name from its goal to “add the words” of sexual orientation and gender identity to the Idaho Human Rights Act. Currently, state law only prevents against discrimination based on age, disability, race, color, national origin, religion, and sex.

It has garnered a large following from the state’s LGBT activist community, young liberals, journalists and commentators, and Democratic politicians. It has a Facebook page with over 5 and half thousand “likes” on Facebook, and even has a crowd-funding Indiegogo campaign to fund a documentary on their struggle. The preview plays a voice over of and shows cutaways to Ronald Reagan speaking over images, a shrewd move in a state that delivered all of its 44 counties to the 40th president both times.

While watching the preview, I noticed that most of the cutaways featured the Statehouse, politicians, marches, banners, and, predictably, protesters holding their hands over their ideas symbolizing how they’ve been “silenced.”

The only thing that seemed to be missing from the video, and the movement at large, is any seeming understanding about the world outside of the Statehouse dome.

Most people wake up, drive their kids to school, go to work, grab a beer with their work buddies, and have dinner with their families. No where do you see any of this, save for a cutaway to a lesbian couple in what appears like a marriage ceremony. And yet, none of this seems to register for the activists, who seem to be convinced that once the few magic words of “sexual orientation” and “gender orientation” are written down on parchment paper, poof!, all homophobia and transphobia will have ridden out on the frontier like the end of John Wayne western movie and disappeared.

There’s only one problem: Government’s laws doesn’t win hearts or change minds, no matter how punitive the penalties. The tough work of changing societies happens in our everyday lives in everyday ways. The state “adding the words” against homophobia will no more make society less so than the state “adding the words” against marijuana usage will make society use less of it.

Indeed, robust empirical study has been done of anti-discrimination laws in private business and most have shown that either no noticeable effect, or slight or noticeable negative effects. This shouldn’t be a big shock to those who understand the pesky and persistent laws economics. When governments add burdensome liabilities to employment like arbitrary minimum wages or anti-discrimination laws (especially ones that go further than discriminatory motivation and ban any unequal impact), which raises the marginal cost of employees without increasing their marginal value, employers find creative ways to avoid hiring them because it is in their interest to do so.

This has been the tragic legacy of many, though not all,  anti-discrimination and equal pay laws.

However, it should also be pointed out that the very goals of Add the Words indicates they have absolutely no faith in people to change to do the right thing without the threat of government coercion. The great 19th century French commentator and author of the classic Democracy in America, Alexis de Tocqueville, said a man’s love for absolute government is directly proportionate to his disdain for those around him.

Apparently, it’s not enough that 80% of Idahoans already “believe that no one should be fired from their job because they are gay, straight, or transgender,” as the group’s own website says. If that many citizens already have embraced the LGBT community without “adding” any symbolic words, why all the fuss when it’s likely that that number is only going to increase?

The reason, sadly as for so many for self-righteous nonsense, is that pointless symbolism trumps substantive action–or principled non-action–in contemporary American politics. This is why the House of Representatives have repealed ObamaCare 40-45 some odd times (although it could be hundreds now. I have no idea), and why when the Republicans took control of the lower chamber in 2011 they engaged in the pathetic and stupid act of reading the exact text Constitution (save for the parts about human slavery) on the House floor.

It’s why the extent of Barack Obama’s sad agenda is further restricting liberty of contract by making low-income minority youth unhirable through his arbitrary minimum wage increase of $10.10.

It’s why politicians from both parties in elections, when discussing anecdotal stories about those who have been negatively or positively affected legislation, just happen to always give examples of people in swing states.

It’s why Democrats keep pushing bullshit “assault” weapon bans, even though only a tiny fraction of gun homicides occur from them and evidence from the first one showed no measurable impact.

It’s why Congress always passes meaningless legislation demanding the president “stand with” Israel, or the Republic of Georgia, or Ukraine, or the Syrian rebels (even if they’re with al-Qaeda), so they can grandstand at AIPAC or other hawkish conventions.

And it’s why it doesn’t matter if 4, or 5, or 10, or 80, or 100,000 words are added the Idaho Human Rights Act or any other piece of existing state or federal statutes.

The positive but unromantic, uninspiring truth is society is getting more tolerant and accepting of gays, lesbians, and transgendered people all the time, all on its own. Previously marginalized groups are enjoying a renaissance of acceptance and that is all for the good.

So rather than pursuing meaningless legislation that will have little-to-no positive impact on employment and housing, etc., and unnecessarily delegates more power to the state and away from citizens to decide their own associations, LGBT activists should refocus on issues that really will make a positive difference, like repealing Idaho’s discriminatory same-sex marriage law or expanding school choice and educational freedom so parents can take their bullied gay kids out of hostile environments and put them in good ones.

Pursuits like that, and not adding meaningless words that creates more problem than they solve, is the way to truly help those most marginalized in society.